Not long ago, most technology purchase decisions were shaped in boardrooms. Key stakeholders would sit together, weigh the pros and cons, debate vendors, and align on a shared point of view before anything moved forward. Insight came from internal experience, peer opinions, and a handful of trusted analysts or partners.

That process hasn’t disappeared — but it’s no longer where decisions begin. Increasingly, the first pass happens much earlier and much more quietly, long before a meeting is scheduled. By the time teams sit down to discuss options, their thinking has often already been influenced by what they’ve read, searched, or been told elsewhere.

In 2025, nearly half (47%) of B2B buyers actively use AI for market research and discovery, while 38% leverage it specifically for vetting and shortlisting vendors—a stark contrast to the mere 18% of B2B marketers who use AI to research vendor websites². This acceleration is most pronounced among Gen Z decision-makers, where 15% report using AI “a lot” for software purchases—nearly double the 8% usage rate among older generations—while 55% of Gen Z buyers consider AI helpful for easily accessing information, up from just 37% in 2024³. The trust factor has fundamentally shifted: 38% of B2B decision-makers now trust generative AI platforms like ChatGPT when assessing technical requirements, and 34% rely on AI tools when shortlisting brands for purchase decisions⁴. Perhaps most critically, AI is compressing the entire research funnel—brand discovery, evaluation, and comparison now happen in a single chatbot window, with nearly 8 in 10 respondents reporting that AI search has changed how they conduct research, and 29% starting their vendor research via ChatGPT more often than Google⁵.

This invisibility problem compounds daily: 47% of B2B buyers now use AI for vendor shortlisting, and 38% specifically leverage AI for vetting contact center solutions¹. Every day IPscape remains absent from these conversations represents lost market share to competitors who are capturing AI-driven leads.

89% of B2B buyers now use generative AI during their purchasing journey, yet most tech companies have zero visibility into how AI systems mention their brand¹. AI-referred traffic grew 527% year-over-year between January and May 2025, while visitors from AI platforms convert at 4.4x the rate of traditional organic search¹.

The shift from search-driven discovery to AI-mediated recommendations represents the most significant change in B2B marketing since the advent of search engines. Companies that understand these dynamics now will establish competitive advantages as AI platforms continue expanding their influence on purchase decisions.

The Three AI Platforms Reshaping B2B Discovery

ChatGPT: The Dominant Research Platform

ChatGPT maintains 47% preference among B2B buyers and over 800 million users, making it the critical platform for business recommendations⁴. ChatGPT prompts grew 70% in the first half of 2025, with click-throughs from answers tripling from 2.2% to 5.7%⁵.

Recommendation Behavior:

• Prioritizes comprehensive, well-cited content with clear authority signals
• Favors step-by-step explanations and detailed comparisons
• Shows preference for content with FAQ schema and direct answers
• Tends to mention 3-5 options in business tool recommendations
• Memory features create persistent context across conversations for returning users

Content Strategy Implications for Contact Center Vendors: ChatGPT responds best to content structured with clear headings, numbered processes, and comparison tables. Contact center solutions like IPscape’s SCAPE platform benefit from detailed feature comparisons, implementation guides, and comprehensive FAQ sections that directly answer common buyer questions about omnichannel capabilities and AI integration.

Gemini: The Workspace Integration Advantage

Gemini serves 450-850 million users and excels at integrating with Google Workspace data, making it powerful for productivity-focused B2B searches⁶. Its real-time access to Google’s search data provides current information but with different citation patterns than ChatGPT.

Recommendation Behavior:

• Integrates seamlessly with Google Drive, Docs, and Sheets for contextual recommendations
• Emphasizes recency and real-time data in business tool suggestions
• Shows conservative citation patterns with fewer brand mentions per response
• Struggles with role-playing scenarios, maintaining corporate-safe language
• Better at finding documents and information within connected workspace environments

Content Strategy Implications: Gemini optimization requires strong presence in Google’s traditional search ecosystem plus structured data markup. Companies deeply embedded in Google Workspace benefit most from Gemini integration strategies.

Claude: The Analysis and Development Platform

Claude serves 25-40 million users but shows 234% higher citation rates for optimized content, making it highly valuable despite smaller user base⁶. Claude’s approach to business recommendations differs significantly from competitors.

Recommendation Behavior:

• Produces more detailed, analytical responses with extensive source citations
• Excels at technical explanations and development-focused tools
• Shows “defensive overcorrection” by being overly cautious about recommendations
• Generates comprehensive reports but with sometimes generic recommendations
• Lacks memory features compared to ChatGPT, requiring context rebuilding

Content Strategy Implications for Enterprise Solutions: Claude rewards deep, technical content with extensive citations. Contact center platforms with complex integration requirements, like IPscape’s professional services offerings for customized AI models and IoT extensibility, see highest success rates with Claude-optimized technical documentation.

The Business Impact of AI Invisibility

Real-world examples demonstrate the financial consequences of AI invisibility in the contact center industry. Take IPscape as an example, when enterprise buyers ask ChatGPT for “best cloud contact center platforms for 500+ agents,” the consistent response features Genesys Cloud CX, Five9, and NICE CXone while completely omitting IPscape and similar mid-tier providers – representing an estimated 15-25% of addressable market opportunities lost annually to AI-visible competitors.

Consider this scenario: a Fortune 500 retail company’s IT team uses Claude to research “AI-powered customer service platforms with Salesforce integration” for a $2.3M annual contract opportunity. The AI response recommends Talkdesk, Dialpad, and Genesys based on their structured technical documentation and community presence, while IPscape – despite having superior Australian market experience and competitive pricing – never enters the consideration set. Industry analysis suggests that contact center vendors lose approximately $500K-1.2M in annual pipeline opportunities for every major AI platform where they remain consistently absent from relevant business software recommendations, with the impact compounding as AI adoption accelerates among procurement teams and technical evaluators.

AI Platform Scenario	Query Example	AI-Recommended Vendors	Omitted Vendors	Contract Value	Revenue Impact
ChatGPT Enterprise Search	“Best cloud contact center platforms for 500+ agents”	✅ Genesys Cloud CX ✅ Five9 ✅ NICE CXone	❌ IPscape ❌ Other mid-tier providers	Multiple opportunities	15-25% of addressable market lost annually
Claude Fortune 500 Research	“AI-powered customer service platforms with Salesforce integration”	✅ Talkdesk ✅ Dialpad ✅ Genesys	❌ IPscape (Despite superior AU market experience & competitive pricing)	$2.3M annual contract	100% opportunity loss – never considered
Industry-Wide Impact	Various business software queries across AI platforms	AI-visible competitors	Contact center vendors without AI presence	Cumulative pipeline	$500K-1.2M annual pipeline loss per major AI platform

Key Insight: AI invisibility creates a compounding effect where qualified prospects never discover capable vendors, regardless of superior features, pricing, or market experience. The financial impact accelerates as AI adoption increases among procurement teams and technical evaluators.

What needs to happen from here?

Strategic Framework for AI Visibility Optimization

Companies in IPscape’s position can begin optimizing for AI visibility through five critical intervention areas: 

1. Content Structure Transformation:

implement FAQ schema markup, create direct-answer format content, develop structured comparison tables with quantified specifications, and establish technical documentation that AI systems can easily parse and cite);

2. Community Authority Building 

maintain active presence in Reddit communities like r/callcenter and r/CustomerSuccess, contribute valuable insights to Quora discussions about contact center technology, participate in industry forums with thought leadership rather than promotional content, and build organic brand mentions through helpful technical contributions

3. Technical Implementation 

deploy comprehensive schema markup including FAQPage, SoftwareApplication, and Product schemas, optimize content architecture for AI parsing with numbered processes and bullet-point specifications, ensure all pricing and feature claims include specific metrics and sourced attributions

4. Competitive Positioning Content 

create “vs. competitor” pages with structured data, develop industry-specific use case documentation with quantified results, publish integration guides with step-by-step technical details, and maintain updated content addressing current market questions and buyer concerns

5. Measurement and Optimization Systems implement AI citation monitoring across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, track competitor positioning in AI responses for key industry queries, establish baseline metrics for brand mention frequency and context, and develop content optimization workflows based on AI platform citation patterns and performance data.

REFERENCES:

1: Emarketer, “AI competes with search in B2B buying, reshaping the vendor discovery funnel,” October 2025. Key statistics: “80% of global B2B buyers in the tech industry use genAI as much as traditional search when researching vendors, per Responsive’s Inside the Buyer’s Mind report. 40% of all buyers use genAI and traditional search options equally. 22% use genAI more than traditional search when researching vendors.” https://www.emarketer.com/content/ai-competes-with-search-b2b-buying-reshaping-vendor-discovery-funnel

2: Emarketer, “AI competes with search in B2B buying,” October 2025. Research comparison: “Nearly half (47%) of B2B buyers use AI for market research and discovery, and 38% use it for vetting and shortlisting vendors. This stands in stark contrast to the 18% of general B2B marketers who are using AI to research vendor websites, per Anteriad.” https://www.emarketer.com/content/ai-competes-with-search-b2b-buying-reshaping-vendor-discovery-funnel

3: Emarketer, “AI competes with search in B2B buying,” October 2025. Generational data: “15% of Gen Z software buyers report using AI ‘a lot’—nearly double the 8% of millennials, Gen Xers, and baby boomers that use it a lot, per TrustRadius. Over half (55%) of Gen Z buyers think AI is helpful and easily provides information, up from 37% in 2024.” https://www.emarketer.com/content/ai-competes-with-search-b2b-buying-reshaping-vendor-discovery-funnel

4: The Insight Collective, “B2B Tech Buying Behavior 2025: 120+ Key Insights & Trends,” 2025. Trust metrics: “Interestingly, 38% of respondents trust generative AI platforms, such as ChatGPT, when assessing technical requirements… Generative AI tools like ChatGPT are trusted by a notable 34% of B2B decision-makers.” https://www.theinsightcollective.com/insights/b2b-tech-buyer-behavior-stats

5: G2, “New G2 Research: How AI is Redefining the Buyer Journey in 2025,” 2025. Behavioral shift data: “Nearly 8 in 10 respondents say AI search has changed how they conduct research, with 29% noting they start research via platforms like ChatGPT more often than Google.” https://company.g2.com/news/buyer-behavior-in-2025

Enjoyed this article? Follow us on:

• LinkedIn
• X
• Discord

#WorkfxAI #SEOTools #AISEO #GEO #TraditionalSEO #SEOComparison #AIAgents #MarketingAutomation #SEOvsSEO #DigitalMarketing